Re: Sort Refinement
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Sort Refinement |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1206054439.4285.628.camel@ebony.site обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Sort Refinement (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Commit Fest (was Re: Sort Refinement)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 18:08 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > Currently, our sort algorithm assumes that its input is unsorted. So if > > your data is sorted on (a) and you would like it to be sorted on (a,b) > > then we need to perform the full sort of (a,b). > > Simon, would it be too much to ask that you concentrate on reviewing > existing patches during commit fest? Trying to get people to think > about random new ideas is about the most direct undermining of the > commit-fest concept that I can think of. Save 'em for later. That's a fair reminder, thanks, I will do that. I have no wish at all to undermine things. -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: