Re: Postgres Analysis Tool-Pak
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres Analysis Tool-Pak |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 12056.958804221@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Postgres Analysis Tool-Pak (Mike Mascari <mascarm@mascari.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Mike Mascari <mascarm@mascari.com> writes: > I've been able to implement around 300 of the 320 Excel-style > functions and was wondering if they would be useful to > PostgreSQL. Seems like we could certainly stick these into a contrib directory. I'd be a little hesitant to cram so many names into the default installation, for fear of conflicting with existing user setups --- but a contrib distribution has no such constraint. (Also, aren't some of these the same as ODBC-standard functions? I believe Thomas has been working on including all the ODBC functions into the backend, so you could save him some work there.) > Or I could just wait until the rewrite if the function call interface > is going to change dramatically for this such as NULL handling etc. What I have done so far cleans up NULL handling, but I have not tried to do anything about functions accepting or returning sets. I think the plan is to see if we can support set functions better as part of the querytree redesign scheduled for 7.2. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: