Re: pg_dump additional options for performance
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump additional options for performance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1204055729.4252.437.camel@ebony.site обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dump additional options for performance (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 13:18 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > I've not been advocating improving pg_restore, which is where the -Fc > > tricks come in. > > ... > > I see you thought I meant pg_restore. I don't thinking extending > > pg_restore in that way is of sufficiently generic use to make it > > worthwhile. Extending psql would be worth it, since not all psql scripts > > come from pg_dump. > > OK, the reason I didn't grasp what you are proposing is that it's insane. > > We can easily, and backwards-compatibly, improve pg_restore to do > concurrent restores. Trying to make psql do something like this will > require a complete rewrite, and there is no prospect that it will work > for any input that didn't come from (an updated version of) pg_dump > anyway. Furthermore you will have to write a whole bunch of new code > just to duplicate what pg_dump/pg_restore already do, ie store/retrieve > the TOC and dependency info in a program-readable fashion. > > Since the performance advantages are still somewhat hypothetical, > I think we should reach for the low-hanging fruit first. If concurrent > pg_restore really does prove to be the best thing since sliced bread, > *then* would be the time to start thinking about whether it's possible > to do the same thing in less-constrained scenarios. Working late isn't very helpful if this type of comment is all it delivers. I've said that the low hanging fruit is split files from pg_dump, hence the title of this thread. I've said I'm *not* planning to work on concurrent pg_restore or concurrent psql and I don't regard either of them as low hanging fruit. But concurrent pg_restore is a big waste of time, however low it hangs. If you have a performance problem on load, putting all your data into a single huge file is not the right starting point to solve your load problem and as Greg points out data files from other sources aren't ever in pg_dump format. -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: