Re: Analogue to SQL Server UniqueIdentifier?
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Analogue to SQL Server UniqueIdentifier? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1203454452.5837.5.camel@mha-laptop.clients.sollentuna.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Analogue to SQL Server UniqueIdentifier? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Analogue to SQL Server UniqueIdentifier?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 11:07 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: > >> Lack of support for Windows, which it sounds like the OP might be running? > > > That's something that's been on my agenda for a while. There are certainly > > UUID generation functions available on Windows - at least for some of the > > cases supported by uuid-ossp. If I were to write the same functions for > > that one, where would people prefer that to go - in the uuid-ossp module > > even though that's actually not correct (since it wouldn't be using ossp) > > or a separate module uuid-win32? > > The latter is *completely* unacceptable. The entire point here is to > not expose any differences at the SQL level. > > Why can't ossp be used --- is it impossible to port to Windows? I haven't looked into the details - it's possible that it could be portable to Windows. But that would a Yet Another Dependency to be bale to build and run pg... So I'd like to avoid it if possible. //Magnus
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: