Re: config files in /data
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: config files in /data |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 12031.959814933@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: config files in /data (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: config files in /data
Re: config files in /data |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: >> Right. How about `$PGDATA/internal'? Can't be more obvious. Perhaps with >> that we could also have initdb clean up a little more respectfully. > Are we talking about moveing pg_log and pg_shadow? Maybe call it > /global because the tables are global to all databases. We weren't, but it seems like a good idea now that you mention it. So it sounds like we are converging on: $PGDATA itself contains only directly-editable config files $PGDATA/base/ contains database subdirectories (same as now) $PGDATA/global/ contains installation-wide tables (pg_database,pg_shadow, their indices, etc) $PGDATA/internal/ contains anything else that is installation-widebut is not a table. The distinction between /global and /internal is a little bit artificial (which one does pg_log belong in? It's only sort of a table...), so maybe we'd be better off just putting those two together. Don't have a strong opinion either way. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: