Re: JDBC, prepared queries, and partitioning
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: JDBC, prepared queries, and partitioning |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1202938005.16770.514.camel@ebony.site обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: JDBC, prepared queries, and partitioning (Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: JDBC, prepared queries, and partitioning
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 16:06 -0500, Kris Jurka wrote: > > On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Simon Riggs wrote: > > > On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 15:43 -0500, Kris Jurka wrote: > > > >> No, in V3 all prepared statements are prepared regardless of the > >> threshold. > > > > Am I reading the wrong documentation? > > http://jdbc.postgresql.org/documentation/83/connect.html#connection-parameters > > > > The documentation is just simplifying the complexities of named vs unnamed > statements. Aside from a couple of exceptions, an unnamed prepared > statement should perform equivalently to direct execution of the literal > query. Describing it as semi-prepared is complicated and not particularly > useful if there is no way to get non-prepared behavior. OK, but AFAICS the docs relating to prepareThreshold are wrong. They describe behaviour that doesn't happen all of the time, yet there is nothing to indicate that. Happy to provide a patch, if you'd like. -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: