Re: Why are we waiting?
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why are we waiting? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1202404377.4247.6.camel@ebony.site обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Why are we waiting? (Staale Smedseng <Staale.Smedseng@Sun.COM>) |
Ответы |
Re: Why are we waiting?
Re: Why are we waiting? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 16:29 +0100, Staale Smedseng wrote: > On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 19:55, Tom Lane wrote: > > I am wondering if the waits are being > > attributed to the right locks --- I remember such an error in a previous > > set of dtrace results, and some of the other details such as claiming > > shared lock delays but no exclusive lock delays for FirstLockMgrLock > > seem less than credible as well. > > Good catch. We've checked the DTrace scripts against the respective > versions of lwlock.h, and the FirstLockMgrLock is off (this is actually > the results for FirstBufMappingLock). I just realised you are using a lookup to get the text for the name of the lock. You used the same lookup table for both releases? -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: