Re: Truncate Triggers
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Truncate Triggers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1201779955.4453.259.camel@ebony.site обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Truncate Triggers (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Truncate Triggers
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 10:22 +0000, Gregory Stark wrote: > "Decibel!" <decibel@decibel.org> writes: > > > CLUSTER isn't DDL. Most forms of ALTER TABLE are. And CREATE blah, etc. > > Fwiw I would call CLUSTER DDL. Note that it does make a change that's visible > in the table definition afterwards. > > There are plenty of DDL commands which modify data (CREATE INDEX, ATLER TABLE > ALTER COLUMN TYPE). The defining characteristic of DDL is not that it doesn't > modify the data but that it does modify the table definition. > > By that definition CLUSTER is DDL and TRUNCATE is DDL if you look at the > implementation rather than the user-visible effects. Surely the question is more simple: do we want triggers on it? There's a clear case for TRUNCATE to have a triggers. Is there a clear case for any other statements (however you categorise them)? If so, lets hear it, please. -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: