Re: pg_checksums?
От
Ron
Тема
Re: pg_checksums?
Дата
Msg-id
11f5795f-ae2c-4123-93e7-b42d4a1115d7@gmail.com
Ответ на
Re: pg_checksums? (Paul Förster)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
pg_checksums? Paul Förster <paul.foerster@gmail.com>
Re: pg_checksums? Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Re: pg_checksums? Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: pg_checksums? Paul Förster <paul.foerster@gmail.com>
Re: pg_checksums? "Peter J. Holzer" <hjp-pgsql@hjp.at>
Re: pg_checksums? Paul Förster <paul.foerster@gmail.com>
Re: pg_checksums? Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>
Re: pg_checksums? Paul Förster <paul.foerster@gmail.com>
Re: pg_checksums? Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>
Re: pg_checksums? "Peter J. Holzer" <hjp-pgsql@hjp.at>
Re: pg_checksums? Paul Förster <paul.foerster@gmail.com>
Re: pg_checksums? Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>
Re: pg_checksums? Alexander Kukushkin <cyberdemn@gmail.com>
Re: pg_checksums? Paul Förster <paul.foerster@gmail.com>
Re: pg_checksums? Alexander Kukushkin <cyberdemn@gmail.com>
Re: pg_checksums? Paul Förster <paul.foerster@gmail.com>
Re: pg_checksums? Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov@gmail.com>
Re: pg_checksums? Paul Förster <paul.foerster@gmail.com>
Re: pg_checksums? "Peter J. Holzer" <hjp-pgsql@hjp.at>
Re: pg_checksums? Paul Förster <paul.foerster@gmail.com>
Re: pg_checksums? "Peter J. Holzer" <hjp-pgsql@hjp.at>
Re: pg_checksums? Paul Förster <paul.foerster@gmail.com>
Re: pg_checksums? Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: pg_checksums? "Peter J. Holzer" <hjp-pgsql@hjp.at>
Re: pg_checksums? Paul Förster <paul.foerster@gmail.com>
Re: pg_checksums? b55white <b55white@gmail.com>
Re: pg_checksums? Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>
Re: pg_checksums? Paul Förster <paul.foerster@gmail.com>
On 10/29/23 04:11, Paul Förster wrote: > Hi Peter > >> On Oct 29, 2023, at 02:43, Peter J. Holzer wrote: >> I don't think so. AFAIK Replication keeps the data files in sync on a >> bit-for-bit level and turning on checksums changes the data layout. >> Running a cluster where one node has checksums and the other doesn't >> would result in a complete mess. > I agree with the last sentence. This is why I asked if it is safe to enable checksums on a replica, switch over and then do it again on the ex primary, i.e. now new replica without doing a reinit. For that to work, the secondary files would have to remain identical to the primary files. Theoretically that _should_ happen, but it might not, or whatever command that enables checksums after the fact might have a sanity check. As for safety, what do you mean by "safe"? -- Born in Arizona, moved to Babylonia.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления