AW: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Zeugswetter Andreas SB
Тема AW: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem
Дата
Msg-id 11C1E6749A55D411A9670001FA6879633682E2@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at
обсуждение исходный текст
Список pgsql-hackers
> My point is that we'll need in dynamic cleanup anyway and UNDO is
> what should be implemented for dynamic cleanup of aborted changes.

I do not yet understand why you want to handle aborts different than outdated
tuples. The ratio in a well tuned system should well favor outdated tuples.
If someone ever adds "dirty read" it is also not the case that it is guaranteed, 
that nobody accesses the tuple you currently want to undo. So I really miss to see
the big difference.

Andreas


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Lamar Owen
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Using 7.1rc1 under RH 6.2
Следующее
От: "Mikheev, Vadim"
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem