Re: Negative LIMIT and OFFSET?
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Negative LIMIT and OFFSET? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1197643309.15521.116.camel@ebony.site обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Negative LIMIT and OFFSET? (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Negative LIMIT and OFFSET?
Re: Negative LIMIT and OFFSET? Re: Negative LIMIT and OFFSET? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 22:23 -0800, Neil Conway wrote: > On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 22:06 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > I guess that on purely philosophical grounds, it's not an unreasonable > > behavior. For example, "LIMIT n" means "output at most n tuples", > > not "output exactly n tuples". So when it outputs no tuples in the face > > of a negative limit, it's meeting its spec. > > If "LIMIT n" means "emit at most n tuples", then a query that produces 0 > rows with n < 0 is arguably violating its spec, since it has produced > more tuples than the LIMIT specified (0 > n). Interpreted this way, no > result set can be consistent with a negative limit, so I'd vote for > throwing an error. I even found an existing, unused error message called ERRCODE_INVALID_LIMIT_VALUE so here's a patch. -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: