Re: Heavy write activity on first vacuum of fresh TOAST data
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Heavy write activity on first vacuum of fresh TOAST data |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1197582010.4255.1912.camel@ebony.site обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Heavy write activity on first vacuum of fresh TOAST data ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
Ответы |
Re: Heavy write activity on first vacuum of fresh
TOAST data
Re: Heavy write activity on first vacuum of fresh TOAST data Re: Heavy write activity on first vacuum of fresh TOAST data |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 15:19 -0600, Kevin Grittner wrote: > >>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 12:12 PM, in message > <1197569564.4255.1855.camel@ebony.site>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> > wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 11:46 -0600, Kevin Grittner wrote: > >> If the hint bit changes are written to the WAL ... > > > > They're not. > > So one would expect a write-intensive initial vacuum after a > PITR-style recovery? Very perceptive. I was just thinking about that myself. An interesting issue when running with full_page_writes off. > What impact would lack of the hint bits have until a vacuum? Vacuum isn't important here. Its the first idiot to read the data that gets hit. -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: