Re: Autovacuum and OldestXmin
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Autovacuum and OldestXmin |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1195758897.4246.264.camel@ebony.site обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Autovacuum and OldestXmin (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Autovacuum and OldestXmin
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2007-11-22 at 19:02 +0000, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > Even if we could use PageIsPrunable, it would be a bad thing from a > robustness point of view. If we ever failed to set the Prunable-flag on > a page for some reason, VACUUM would never remove the dead tuples. That's a killer reason, I suppose. I was really trying to uncover what the thinking was, so we can document it. Having VACUUM ignore it completely seems wrong. > Besides, I don't remember anyone complaining about VACUUM's CPU usage, > so it doesn't really matter. Recall anybody saying how much they love it? ;-) -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: