Re: Postgres 8.3 archive_command

On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 11:27 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > Perhaps we should move the successful archived message to DEBUG1 now,
> > except for the first message after the archiver starts or when the
> > archive_command changes, plus one message every 255 segments? That would
> > reduce the log volume in the normal case without endangering our ability
> > to see what is happening.
> 
> That would confuse people terribly, and it *would* endanger our ability
> to see what was happening, 254 times out of 255.

That's my feeling too, just wanted to check it still made sense for
y'all.

--  Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com