Re: Visibility map thoughts
От | Jeff Davis |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Visibility map thoughts |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1194371416.22428.183.camel@dogma.ljc.laika.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Visibility map thoughts (Mark Mielke <mark@mark.mielke.cc>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 08:01 -0500, Mark Mielke wrote: > Simon Riggs wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 09:52 +0000, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > > I'm racking my brain trying to think of a query that will benefit from > > index-only scans without specifically creating covered indexes. Apart > > from count(*) queries and RI lookups. I can't see RI lookups being much > > cheaper with this technique, do you see something there > I'm not sure what RI lookup is. Sorry. :-) > > My list would be: > - EXISTS / NOT EXISTS > - COUNT(*) > - Tables that are heavily updated - any case where the index entry often > maps to a non-visible tuple. > > Beyond that, yeah, I cannot think of other benefits. > What about range queries or sorts? The correlation of an index to itself is 100% :) Regards,Jeff Davis
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: