Re: IN vs EXISTS equivalence
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: IN vs EXISTS equivalence |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1193077831.4319.61.camel@ebony.site обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | IN vs EXISTS equivalence ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
Ответы |
Re: IN vs EXISTS equivalence
Re: IN vs EXISTS equivalence |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 09:31 -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote: > I've requested this before without response, but I'm asking again > because it just caused me pain again: could we get a TODO added to > have the planner recognize equivalent IN and EXISTS constructs and > have them compete on cost estimates? I know it's not a trivial > improvement, but if it's on the list maybe someone will pick it up, > and I see it as the single biggest weakness in PostgreSQL > performance. I'll pick it up as a default unless someone requests they have it from me. -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: