Re: Oracle, MySQL, and PostgreSQL feature comparison - Part 2
От | Jeff Davis |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Oracle, MySQL, and PostgreSQL feature comparison - Part 2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1192128089.19081.47.camel@dogma.ljc.laika.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Oracle, MySQL, and PostgreSQL feature comparison - Part 2 ("Derek Rodner" <derek.rodner@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Oracle, MySQL, and PostgreSQL feature comparison - Part 2
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 13:45 -0400, Derek Rodner wrote: > Sean Hull over at Database Journal has posted Part 2 of his database > comparison. > > > > Here are links to both parts: > > Part 1 - > http://www.databasejournal.com/features/oracle/article.php/3692566 > > Part 2 - > http://www.databasejournal.com/features/oracle/article.php/3703376 > > One thing that stood out to me was: "Auditing Oracle allows you to enable auditing to a table, or a file via the audit trail facility. Once enabled, you can audit insert, update, or delete on a specific table, for instance, or logins, or even all access by a particular user. There are quite a few options, and it's easy to enable. Postgresql too has this functionality and it seems to be as flexible and configurable as Oracle's. ..." What functionality is he referring to? There are some projects on pgfoundry, but I don't think of the auditing capabilities of postgresql as either complete or easy. Regards, Jeff Davis
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: