Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review

On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 07:08 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 18:35 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> 
> > I think this project has got too big for us to make things up as we go 
> > along. We need to follow processes that are well understood and 
> > transparent.
> 
> Well said, I very much agree.
> 
> Mostly we do, but since we've just spent more than 6 months between
> Feature Freeze and Beta. There were no well understood or transparent
> processes during that period, so nobody is on solid ground trying to
> enforce a small number of rules with a single individual. Especially
> when discussing what might be argued was a major item in 8.3

I should add that I'm not unhappy about how things have happened and I
have no complaints to lodge anywhere with anybody. Just wanted to give
Jan a bit of moral support, and I've done that now, so time for me to
stop.

--  Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com