Re: [HACKERS] UTF8 or Unicode
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] UTF8 or Unicode |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 11919.1109786060@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] UTF8 or Unicode (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] UTF8 or Unicode
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: >> The correct encoding name is "UTF-8". > True, but Peter says the ANSI standard calls it UTF8 so that's what I > used. What SQL99 actually says is - UTF8 specifies the name of a character repertoire that consists of every character represented by The Unicode Standard Version 2.0 and by ISO/IEC 10646 UTF-8, where each character is encoded using the UTF-8 encoding, occupying from 1 (one) through 6 octets. That is, "UTF8" is an identifier chosen to refer to an encoding which they know perfectly well is really called UTF-8. We should probably follow the same convention of using UTF8 in code identifiers and UTF-8 in documentation. In particular, UTF_8 with an underscore is sanctioned by nobody and should be avoided. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: