Re: HOT patch, missing things
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: HOT patch, missing things |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1187102099.4162.20.camel@ebony.site обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: HOT patch, missing things (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 10:10 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > "Pavan Deolasee" <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com> writes: > > What if we just track the amount of potentially dead space in the > > relation > > (somebody had suggested that earlier in the thread) ? Every committed > > UPDATE/DELETE and aborted UPDATE/INSERT would increment > > the dead space. Whenever page fragmentation is repaired, either during > > normal operation or during vacuum, the dead space is reduced by the > > amount of reclaimed space. Autovacuum triggers whenever the percentage > > of dead space increases beyond a threshold. > > Doesn't this design completely fail to take index bloat into account? > Repairing heap fragmentation does not reduce the need for VACUUM to work > on the indexes. I thought of that, but we will only clean up space that is allowable, so the indexes don't degrade. -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: