Re: Win32 processCancelRequest/waitpid (was fork/exec patch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Win32 processCancelRequest/waitpid (was fork/exec patch
Дата
Msg-id 11859.1073764458@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Win32 processCancelRequest/waitpid (was fork/exec patch  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Win32 processCancelRequest/waitpid (was fork/exec patch  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> As I understand it, the postmaster shared memory idea is good because
> only the postmaster writes to it, and only the backends read from it.
> If the HANDLE works the same way, I think you should put it into the
> shared memory too, hence (b).

But the postmaster needs to use the HANDLE, hence not (b).

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Win32 processCancelRequest/waitpid (was fork/exec patch
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: psql-current italian translation updates