Re: Hot Standby, release candidate?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Hot Standby, release candidate?
Дата
Msg-id 11858.1260816533@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Hot Standby, release candidate?  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: Hot Standby, release candidate?  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
>  * Disallow clustering system relations.  This will definitely NOT work
>  * for shared relations (we have no way to update pg_class rows in other
>  * databases), nor for nailed-in-cache relations (the relfilenode values
>  * for those are hardwired, see relcache.c).  It might work for other
>  * system relations, but I ain't gonna risk it.

> I would presume we would not want to relax the restriction on CLUSTER
> working on these tables, even if new VACUUM FULL does.

Why not?  If we solve the problem of allowing these relations to change
relfilenodes, then CLUSTER would work just fine on them.  Whether it's
particularly useful is not ours to decide I think.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Python 3.1 support
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Python 3.1 support