Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> [much snipped]
> Why are so few people committers?
> ...
> The answer to both questions is because CVS limitations make it hard to do
> better.
Uh, no. The reason there are so few committers is that there are so few
people qualified not to break things.
If we had a community with hundreds of people with commit access, very
possibly we'd be feeling the need of a better SCM system. But right
now, CVS is not the bottleneck, and I don't see that we'd get a payback
for the pain of changing to something else.
regards, tom lane