Re: Unicode problem ???
От | John Sidney-Woollett |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Unicode problem ??? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1185.192.168.0.64.1082559089.squirrel@mercury.wardbrook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Unicode problem ??? ("Priem, Alexander" <ap@cict.nl>) |
Ответы |
Re: Unicode problem ???
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Priem, Alexander said: > Could this be due to the fact that the database was CREATED using > SQL_ASCII > encoding? Maybe your solution only works when the database was created > using > LATIN1 or UNICODE encoding. Yes, I suspect > Maybe I'll just try recreating the database using UNICODE or LATIN1 > encoding > tomorrow. UNICODE seems the best, right? Or does LATIN1 have more > possibilities than UNICODE? Unicode has a larger character set than latin-1. But if you only need to support latin-1 then use that... Of course, if you have to upgrade to support unicode later, you'll wish you had started off using latin-1! I'm no expert on this, so I hope this info is correct. John Sidney-Woollett
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: