Re: SetBufferCommitInfoNeedsSave and race conditions
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SetBufferCommitInfoNeedsSave and race conditions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1183068576.3589.5.camel@silverbirch.site обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SetBufferCommitInfoNeedsSave and race conditions (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: SetBufferCommitInfoNeedsSave and race conditions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 15:16 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com> writes: > > AFAICS, we can just simply remove the assertion. But is there any > > codepaths that assume that after calling HeapTupleSatisfiesSnapshot, all > > appropriate hint bits are set? > > There had better not be, since we are going to postpone setting hint > bits for recently-committed transactions as part of the async-commit > patch. > > A quick grep suggests that VACUUM FULL might be at risk here. No we're clear: I caught that issue specifically for VACUUM FULL fairly early on. VF assumes all hint bits are set after the first scan, so we flush prior to the scan to ensure its safe to set the hint bits. There are no concurrent hint bit setters, so we are good. -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: