Re: Replication
От | Jeff Davis |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1182288169.1926.15.camel@dogma.v10.wvs обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Replication (Craig James <craig_james@emolecules.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 16:14 -0700, Craig James wrote: > Looking for replication solutions, I find: > > Slony-I > Seems good, single master only, master is a single point of failure, > no good failover system for electing a new master or having a failed > master rejoin the cluster. Slave databases are mostly for safety or > for parallelizing queries for performance. Suffers from O(N^2) > communications (N = cluster size). > There's MOVE SET which transfers the origin (master) from one node to another without losing any committed transactions. There's also FAILOVER, which can set a new origin even if the old origin is completely gone, however you will lose the transactions that haven't been replicated yet. To have a new node join the cluster, you SUBSCRIBE SET, and you can MOVE SET to it later if you want that to be the master. Regards, Jeff Davis
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: