Re: Apparent Wraparound?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От g.hintermayer@inode.at
Тема Re: Apparent Wraparound?
Дата
Msg-id 1182198497.043063.277700@w5g2000hsg.googlegroups.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Apparent Wraparound?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Ответы Re: Apparent Wraparound?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Aha, google thinks it's wise to make the last postings (probably if
more than n ?) show only the poster name and make the name clickable.
Not  very userfriendly :-( but now i know it ;-)

Sorry if that wasn't clear. I'm getting the same log entry as the
original
poster, i.e.: LOG:  could not truncate directory "pg_subtrans":
apparent
wraparound.

I'm just running an analysis of the "daily transaction id consumption"
on my databases to see, if the uptime of the server matches with the
time the wraparound was logged.

Gerhard


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "John Smith"
Дата:
Сообщение: postgresql and solaris 10: pitch to sysadmins
Следующее
От: "Simon Riggs"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Pg_standby and shutting down the warm standby