Re: Apparent Wraparound?
От | g.hintermayer@inode.at |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Apparent Wraparound? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1182157691.494610.260120@c77g2000hse.googlegroups.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Apparent Wraparound? (g.hintermayer@inode.at) |
Ответы |
Re: Apparent Wraparound?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Jun 13, 2:35 pm, g.hinterma...@inode.at wrote: > On Jun 8, 3:23 pm, alvhe...@commandprompt.com (Alvaro Herrera) wrote: > > > > > Gunther Mayer wrote: > > > Hi there, > > > > I just found the following message in my logs: > > > > Jun 8 10:38:38 caligula postgres[56868]: [1-1] : LOG: could not > > > truncate directory "pg_subtrans": apparent wraparound > > > > Should I be worried or can I just ignore this one? My database is still > > > small (a pg_dumpall bzippe'd is still around 500KB) so I doubt that I'm > > > affected by any transaction id wraparound problems. I also vacuum > > > analyze once a day and have pg_autovacuum turned on. > > > What version are you running? This seems to match the description of a > > bug fixed for 8.2 and 8.1.5: > > I noticed the same message in my logfiles (once on each of two > servers). I'm running 8.1.8, and the server's been running flawless > for about 2 months. > > Gerhard Can someone tell me if I should be concerned about this log entry ? My database is quite large (~ 2G in PGDATA) regards Gerhard
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: