On Fri, 2007-06-01 at 17:00 +0200, Alexander Staubo wrote:
> the projected Slony-II design, but the setup seems dead simple, and
> from the docs I have found it seems to transparently replicate schema
> changes, unlike Slony-I. So that's something.
>
To be fair to Slony-I, the fact that it does not replicate DDL is a
feature, not a bug. It's table-based, which is a very flexible design.
Regards,
Jeff Davis