Re: pg_ctl -w vs unix_socket_directory
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_ctl -w vs unix_socket_directory |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 11786.1190157231@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pg_ctl -w vs unix_socket_directory (Radoslaw Zielinski <radek42@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_ctl -w vs unix_socket_directory
Re: pg_ctl -w vs unix_socket_directory |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Radoslaw Zielinski <radek42@gmail.com> writes: > "pg_ctl -w -D ... start" doesn't work when unix_socket_directory is set > to somewhere else than the compiled in default ("/tmp"). pg_ctl not working is going to be the very least of your worries; pretty much nothing else will either. If you want some other socket directory, I strongly recommend setting the path to it at compile time so that it's properly wired into libpq. AFAICS the only value in specifying unix_socket_directory at server start is if you actually *want* a stealth server that won't be found by clients without manual intervention. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: