Re: Event Triggers: adding information
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Event Triggers: adding information |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 11782.1358535557@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Event Triggers: adding information (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Event Triggers: adding information
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > Andres Freund escribi�: >> Dimitri's earlier patches had support for quite some commands via >> deparsing and while its a noticeable amount of code it seemed to work >> ok. >> The last revision I could dig out is >> https://github.com/dimitri/postgres/blob/d2996303c7bc6daa08cef23e3d5e07c3afb11191/src/backend/utils/adt/ddl_rewrite.c > I looked at that code back then and didn't like it very much. The > problem I see (as Robert does, I think) is that it raises the burden > when you change the grammar -- you now need to edit not only gram.y, but > the ddl_rewrite.c stuff to ensure your new thing can be reverse-parsed. Well, that burden already exists for non-utility statements --- why should utility statements get a pass? Other than that we tend to invent new utility syntax freely, which might be a good thing to discourage anyhow. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: