Re: List of Bitmapset (was Re: ExecRTCheckPerms() and many prunable partitions)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: List of Bitmapset (was Re: ExecRTCheckPerms() and many prunable partitions) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1175541.1668536716@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: List of Bitmapset (was Re: ExecRTCheckPerms() and many prunable partitions) (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: List of Bitmapset (was Re: ExecRTCheckPerms() and many prunable partitions)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 11:57 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> + * The new member is identified by the zero-based index of the List >> + * element it should go into, and the bit number to be set therein. > The comment sounds a bit ambiguous, especially the ", and the bit > number to be set therein." part. If you meant to describe the > arguments, how about mentioning their names too, as in: Done that way in the patch I just posted. >> + /* forboth will stop at the end of the shorter list, which is fine */ > Isn't this comment unnecessary given that the while loop makes both > lists be the same length? No, the while loop ensures that a is at least as long as b. It could have started out longer, though. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: