Re: ALTER TABLESPACE MOVE command tag tweak
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ALTER TABLESPACE MOVE command tag tweak |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 11731.1402695412@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ALTER TABLESPACE MOVE command tag tweak (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: ALTER TABLESPACE MOVE command tag tweak
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > The problem in this particular case is that TABLESPACE is a "global" > object, thus not supported; but ALTER TABLESPACE MOVE is a command that > modifies tables (which *are* supported), not tablespaces. > ALTER TABLESPACE MOVE is a glorified ALTER TABLE. If ALTER TABLESPACE > MOVE returned ALTER TABLE as a tag, I think it'd work well too; but not > ALTER TABLESPACE. Individually, since the implementation works by > calling AlterTableInternal(), it already works. > Now if you state that the current design in event_triggers that works by > slicing CommandTag and comparing the pieces is broken, I don't disagree > and I think I have now (in the patch posted in a nearby thread) some > more infrastructure to do it differently. But even if we do that, I > think we're going to need a way to differentiate ALTER TABLESPACE MOVE > from other forms of ALTER TABLESPACE. I haven't given this much > thought, though. Yeah, I'd not paid much attention to it either. Now that I look at it, ALTER TABLESPACE MOVE seems like a pretty unfortunate choice of naming all around, because (unless I'm misunderstanding) it doesn't actually alter any property of the tablespace itself. It might be a bit late to propose this, but I wonder if some syntax along the lines of MOVE ALL [ TABLES | INDEXES | ... ] IN TABLESPACE foo TO bar wouldn't be less confusing. Not sure what we'd use as command tag for it though (not MOVE, since that's taken). regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: