Re: UPSERT
От | Hannu Krosing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: UPSERT |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1173012947.3132.6.camel@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: UPSERT (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: UPSERT
Re: UPSERT |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Ühel kenal päeval, R, 2007-03-02 kell 10:13, kirjutas Tom Lane: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > > My instinct would be to follow your first strategy, i.e. detect which > > path is needed rather than try one and then if it fails do the other. > > The very first thing you need to think about is how to solve the race > condition problem, ie, two backends concurrently trying to insert > identical data. Then one of them will update the data inserted by whoeved got the insert first. > Until you have a plausible mechanism for that, the > whole thing is pie-in-the-sky. Is'nt the standard way of doing it thus: UPDATE IF NOT FOUND THEN INSERT IF DUPLICATE KEY THEN UPDATE END IF END IF At least this is how UPSERT is usually done in plpgsql -- ---------------- Hannu Krosing Database Architect Skype Technologies OÜ Akadeemia tee 21 F, Tallinn, 12618, Estonia Skype me: callto:hkrosing Get Skype for free: http://www.skype.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: