Re: Synchronized Scan update
От | Jeff Davis |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Synchronized Scan update |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1172876630.13722.226.camel@dogma.v10.wvs обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Synchronized Scan update (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Synchronized Scan update
Re: Synchronized Scan update Re: Synchronized Scan update |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Is there any consensus about whether to include these two parameters as GUCs or constants if my patch is to be accepted? (1) sync_scan_threshold: Use synchronized scanning for tables greater than this many pages; smaller tables will not be affected. (2) sync_scan_offset: Start a new scan this many pages before a currently running scan to take advantage of the pagesthat are likely already in cache. Right now they are just constants defined in a header, but a GUC might make sense. I'd like to know which version is more acceptable when I submit my final patch. Regards,Jeff Davis
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: