Re: AC_REPLACE_FUNCS([getaddrinfo]) in 8.1.3
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: AC_REPLACE_FUNCS([getaddrinfo]) in 8.1.3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 11707.1140502223@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: AC_REPLACE_FUNCS([getaddrinfo]) in 8.1.3 (Albert Chin <pgsql-hackers@mlists.thewrittenword.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: AC_REPLACE_FUNCS([getaddrinfo]) in 8.1.3
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Albert Chin <pgsql-hackers@mlists.thewrittenword.com> writes: > On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 11:32:53PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> Would you try the patch proposed at >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-01/msg00299.php > Works fine on Tru64 UNIX 4.0D and 5.1. OK, applied to HEAD and 8.1. I'm feeling a bit of concern though after re-reading the comment attached to the test: # (Note: the AC_TRY_LINK probe fails on Windows, where the available # versions of getaddrinfo don't follow normal C call protocol. This is OK # because we want to use our own getaddrinfo.c on Windows anyway.) It seems likely that the new coding will allow the test to *succeed* on Windows. Does that happen, and if so is it bad? We can put in a hack to suppress the test on Windows if necessary. Someone please check it out on Windows ... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: