Re: postgresql scalability, active-active cluster
От | Jeff Davis |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgresql scalability, active-active cluster |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1169496489.20694.15.camel@dogma.v10.wvs обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | postgresql scalability, active-active cluster (brian stone <skye0507@yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: postgresql scalability, active-active cluster
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 06:55 -0800, brian stone wrote: > Are there any built in tools or 3rd party tools for distributing a > postgresql database? I need an active active configuration; master- > master with fail over. The project I am working needs to support a > very large number of transactions a second. It will eventually require > a main frame, or some absurd hardware. It makes much more sense to > consider a clustered configuration. DB requests come in from a row of > application servers. It would be nice if these requests could be > distributed. > Consider pgpool, and look at the partitioning feature (which uses different machines for different records, allowing writes to happen very quickly). Also, depending on what your needs are, a relational database might not be right for you. You say you need transactions, but if you're comparing to MySQL's master-master, I don't think that even supports ACID transactions. Do you actually need transactions, or just many writes per second (perhaps to memory rather than disk)? Regards, Jeff Davis
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: