FE/BE Protocol, Tom?
От | pgsql@mohawksoft.com |
---|---|
Тема | FE/BE Protocol, Tom? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1168.68.162.220.216.1050602129.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: FE/BE Protocol, Tom?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I just had an idea today, sort of inspired by some work I am doing and by a patch to bind which uses an external database. You'll think I'm nuts, but hear me out. What if the BE protocol was constructed as a loadable plugin? The plugin handles the "front" of the PostgreSQL backend. It reads from a socket and handles a request. There should also be the ability to have multiple BE protocols loaded at once. Each on their own port, of course. So the postmaster process listens to a number of sockets for connections, when a socket is accepted, its protocol handler is pulled out of a hash table or array, a new backend is spawned (or perhaps a new thread is created in some unlikely future PG), and control is passed to the BE protocol handler. It is the job of the BE handler to read a socket and write the results. The postmaster process need not care about what the backend handler does. The only issue would be to try to document a process for creating a custom BE protocol handler. This would allow PG to incorporate a web services protocol. It would allow servers like email, DNS, etc. to be constructed from within PostgreSQL. What do you think?
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: