Re: wal_checksum = on (default) | off
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: wal_checksum = on (default) | off |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1167926200.20749.144.camel@silverbirch.site обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: wal_checksum = on (default) | off (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: wal_checksum = on (default) | off
Re: [HACKERS] wal_checksum = on (default) | off |
Список | pgsql-patches |
On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 10:00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > "Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > In this thread, I outlined an idea for reducing cost of WAL CRC checking > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-10/msg01299.php > > wal_checksum = on (default) | off > > This still seems awfully dangerous to me. Understood. > > Recovery can occur with/without same setting of wal_checksum, to avoid > > complications from crashes immediately after turning GUC on. > > Surely not. Otherwise even the "on" setting is not really a defense. Only when the CRC is exactly zero, which happens very very rarely. -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: