Re: TupleDescs and refcounts and such, again
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: TupleDescs and refcounts and such, again |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1167261163.3633.64.camel@silverbirch.site обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: TupleDescs and refcounts and such, again (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: TupleDescs and refcounts and such, again
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2006-12-27 at 18:05 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > "Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > Is it possible to allocate the subquery in a child context of the main > > query, so that it is technically a different context, yet can be freed > > simultaneously? > > That's exactly what the code *was* doing, but the problem is that we'd > free the child context during ExecEndSubqueryScan, at which point the > tupdesc is still needed. OK, I guess my only other question is to do with recursive/hierarchical queries: How will we handle those? All in same context? I guess many subqueries are transformable into main joins anyway, so the distinction is probably moot anyhow. -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: