Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 11664.973874369@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1 (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1
Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1 Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1 |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> When we implement schemas, then all objects belonging to the
> DEFINITION_SCHEMA will not be dumped, all other objects will be. At least
> I imagine that this might be something to work with.
That's a thought, although it still doesn't cope with the issue of
"what if I've altered a standard system object?" ... which is what
I think Mark was getting at yesterday. I'm not sure there's any
reasonable way to handle that, though, short of diff'ing against a
dump of template1 :-(
To bring this back from future nice solutions to the reality of what
to do today, do people like the "template0" solution for now (7.1)?
I can work on it if so.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: