Re: EXPLAIN ANALYZE
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: EXPLAIN ANALYZE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1165790760.3839.813.camel@silverbirch.site обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: EXPLAIN ANALYZE (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: EXPLAIN ANALYZE
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 2006-12-10 at 09:28 -0500, Neil Conway wrote: > On Sun, 2006-12-10 at 13:00 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote: > > With that requirement in mind, how about something simple like: > > > > explain_analyze_timeout = n > > > > When timeout is reached the EA returns results as if it had finished > > executing normally, though with some additional text to make it very > > clear that the displayed results are partial execution only. > > Sounds like a bit of a kludge, IMHO. Without a doubt. I was hoping for some further inspiration... How about any of these? EXPLAIN [ ANALYZE [TIME LIMIT n]] [ VERBOSE ] statement EXPLAIN [ ANALYZE [SHOW STATISTICS AFTER n]] [ VERBOSE ] statement Neither of which need new keywords. > EXPLAIN ANALYZE isn't designed to > provide online feedback about the execution of a query, which I think is > the real feature here. There has been prior discussion about how to do > online progress indication for queries in general[1] -- I think some > sort of "online EXPLAIN ANALYZE" would be a natural part of such a > feature. > > -Neil > > [1] http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Query_progress_indication Well, that all looks good and can see I'd want all of those things. The EA case is pretty straightforward though; we don't really need regular feedback as much as *any* feedback. So, I'm seeing it as a very simple case of the overall requirement. It's also a special case in that the output from a partial EA needs to be the same shape as a normal EA. Query progress data would likely be a different shape, no? You'd need some estimates of eventual time based upon a re-evaluation of the original estimates based upon things learned so far during execution. i.e. at start we thought this loop would be called X times (planner estimate), so far its been called Y times (EA actual) and based upon that we now think it will be called Z times. So I'm thinking of enhancing EA to provide partial results rather than go for the Full Monty just yet. BTW, can anybody edit the Wiki? I didn't realise it existed. -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: