Re: psql return codes
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql return codes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1165434534.3839.421.camel@silverbirch.site обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: psql return codes (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: psql return codes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 14:25 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > Jim C. Nasby wrote: > >> Why should it matter if the "SELECT * FROM foo" came to > >> psql via -f or -c? > > > Well, it explains exactly what Simon was seeing. I agree it is strange, > > but I was asking if Simon knew it was documented. Yes, but it doesn't say what a "script" is and doesn't explain either. > I assume the "3" is > > used to report a different error from 'file not found' or something. > > Well, the real point here is that ON_ERROR_STOP doesn't apply to > interactive input, and -c is evidently being considered to be > interactive. You could argue that either way I suppose I'm all ears... > , but seeing > that -c can only issue a single command, implementing ON_ERROR_STOP > for it seems like largely a waste of effort. The main point is that rc=1 doesn't always mean the same thing, which makes it harder to write scripts that handle errors correctly. It may be a small thing, but that doesn't make it right. -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: