Re: RC1 blocker issues
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: RC1 blocker issues |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1164405903.3841.716.camel@silverbirch.site обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: RC1 blocker issues (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2006-11-24 at 12:37 -0800, David Fetter wrote: > On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 02:48:22PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > I wrote: > > > * possible rearrangement of pg_stat column order: > > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-11/msg00643.php > > > Should we do this, and if so should we force initdb (via a > > > catversion change)? I'm currently leaning to the thought that if > > > we change it we should force initdb, else we'll risk having a > > > noticeable user-visible difference between different "8.2" > > > installations. > > > > Actually, on looking closer, we *must* force initdb because this > > changes the expected output for the rules regression test. > > > > So, yea or nay? I'm working up the patch right now, but will hold > > off applying until I hear some comments. > > +1 on applying it. Beta testers should understand what "beta" and > "test" mean. :) Yes, I would like to rearrange the columns. -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: