Re: Adding an ignore list to pg_restore, prototype patch #1
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Adding an ignore list to pg_restore, prototype patch #1 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 11637.1140887919@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Adding an ignore list to pg_restore, prototype patch #1 (Martin Pitt <mpitt@debian.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Adding an ignore list to pg_restore, patch take #3
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Martin Pitt <mpitt@debian.org> writes: > Martin Pitt [2006-02-19 14:39 +0100]: >> Since this changes the behaviour of pg_restore, this should probably >> become an option, e. g. -D / --ignore-existing-table-data. I'll do >> this if you agree to the principle of the current patch. > I improved the patch now to only ignore TABLE DATA for existing tables > if '-X ignore-existing-tables' is specified. I also updated the > documentation. This patch is unbelievably ugly and probably vulnerable to coredumps. Please use a cleaner way of disabling the subsequent load than tromping all over the TOC datastructure, ie, not this: > + strcpy (tes->desc, "IGNOREDATA"); BTW, I'm pretty sure it fails for tables with same names in different schemas, too. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: