Re: [PATCHES] Bug in WAL backup documentation
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCHES] Bug in WAL backup documentation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1162595366.3587.788.camel@silverbirch.site обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCHES] Bug in WAL backup documentation (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCHES] Bug in WAL backup documentation
Re: [PATCHES] Bug in WAL backup documentation Re: [PATCHES] Bug in WAL backup documentation |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 17:34 +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 11:25:09AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > Since 8.1 has done this all along and no one's actually complained about > > it, I guess no one is using scripts that do "cd". I'm inclined to go > > with Bernd's suggestion to change the docs to match the code, but does > > anyone have a contrary opinion? > In Unix you can easily prepend $PWD to the > string, but I don't know how easy that is in Windows. Windows input anyone? Given the lack of a comprehensive test suite at this stage, I'd vote on the side of least change right now. We know the existing mechanism works, and as Martijn point out there is a workaround, plus as Tom discusses this would only happen if people "cd" which in my book would be bad programming form anyway. +1 Doc bug for 8.2, feature request for 8.3, unless Windows bites. -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: