Re: More 8.2 client issues (Was: [Slow dump?)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: More 8.2 client issues (Was: [Slow dump?) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 11617.1167841479@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: More 8.2 client issues (Was: [Slow dump?) (Erik Jones <erik@myemma.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: More 8.2 client issues (Was: [Slow dump?)
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Erik Jones <erik@myemma.com> writes: > ... > sigaction(SIGPIPE, 0x08046E20, 0x08046E70) = 0 > send(4, " Q\0\0\0E5 S E L E C T ".., 230, 0) = 230 > <----------------------------------------------------------- Hang is > right here! > sigaction(SIGPIPE, 0x08046E20, 0x08046E70) = 0 > pollsys(0x08046EE8, 1, 0x00000000, 0x00000000) (sleeping...) > pollsys(0x08046EE8, 1, 0x00000000, 0x00000000) = 1 > recv(4, " T\0\0\0 P\003 o i d\0\0".., 16384, 0) = 140 > ... Hmph. So it seems the delay really is on the server's end. Any chance you could truss the connected backend process too and see what it's doing? Actually ... before you do that, the first query for "\d pg_class" should look like SELECT c.oid, n.nspname, c.relname FROM pg_catalog.pg_class c LEFT JOIN pg_catalog.pg_namespace n ON n.oid = c.relnamespace WHERE c.relname ~ '^(pg_class)$' AND pg_catalog.pg_table_is_visible(c.oid) ORDER BY 2, 3; I could see this taking an unreasonable amount of time if you had a huge number of pg_class rows or a very long search_path --- is your database at all out of the ordinary in those ways? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: