Re: Bug in pg_describe_object

Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se> writes:
> On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 14:01 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It really shouldn't be useful to include those.  Attend what it says in
>> the fine manual for CREATE OPERATOR CLASS:

> Hm, that is not what I see when reading the source.

> There can exist several entries in pg_amproc for one operator family
> with the same short_number and function (both name and types).

We're cheating in a small number of places by using a binary-compatible
hash function to implement hashing for a datatype other than the one
it's declared to work on.  I don't think that the existence of that hack
means that getObjectDescription should bloat the descriptions of every
amproc entry with generally-useless information.
        regards, tom lane