Re: best way to choose index to cluster on?
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: best way to choose index to cluster on? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1159223503.26848.46.camel@state.g2switchworks.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: best way to choose index to cluster on? (adey <adey11@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
Note that PostgreSQL doesn't auto-update clustered indexes. i.e. they deteriorate over time, and require being re-clustered after a while. On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 17:27, adey wrote: > A good guide for a clustered index is:- > Will the index be unique, static and narrow. > If not, avoid clustered indexing as they require extra work on disk to > maintain their sequence. > > > On 9/26/06, Chris Hoover <revoohc@gmail.com> wrote: > I am looking to squeeze a bit more speed out of my database by > clustering most of my tables. However, on tables with > multiple indexes, how is the best way to choose the index. I > am thinking I want to use the index with the largest > pg_stat_user_indexes.idx_tup_read. Would this be correct? If > not, what column(s) and views should I be looking at to find > the most popular index? > > Secondly, I have some partial indexes on a very active table, > and it tends to have the highest idx_tup_read for that table. > Is is possible to cluster on a partial index? > > Thanks, > > Chris >
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: