Re: pg_terminate_backend
От | Csaba Nagy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_terminate_backend |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1154623004.21451.82.camel@coppola.muc.ecircle.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_terminate_backend (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_terminate_backend
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> "Stuck?" You have not shown us a case where SIGTERM rather than SIGINT > is necessary or appropriate. It seems to me the above is assuming the > existence of unknown backend bugs, exactly the same thing you think > I shouldn't be assuming ... I do know a case where a plain kill will seem to be stucked: on vacuum of a big table. I guess when it starts an index's cleanup scan it will insist to finish it before stopping. I'm not sure if that's the cause, but I have seen delays of 30 minutes for killing a vacuum... it's true that finally it always did die... but it's also true that I have 'kill -9'-ed it before because I thought it's stucked. Cheers, Csaba.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: